Known Issues for the NAG Library FL Interface
This document reflects all reported and resolved issues that affect recent releases of the NAG Library FL Interface.
Some of these issues may have been fixed at intermediate "point" releases of the Library, while other fixes are scheduled for incorporation at future releases. For library Marks where those fixes are not yet incorporated, a workaround for the known issue is provided wherever possible.
To find the Mark and point release number of your library, call NAG routine a00aaf( ).
For issues that affect releases of other interfaces, please also see
Order the issues by
Synopsis | Overflow may occur if the routine attempts to scale the polynomial coefficients. |
Description | In rare circumstances overflow may be observed if . |
Severity | Non-critical |
Issue Since Mark | 16 |
Workaround | Set argument . |
Synopsis | d02ngf can fail on stationary problems. |
Description | d02ngf can fail on stationary problems.. |
Severity | Critical |
Issue Since Mark | 23 |
Fixed at Mark | 27.3 |
Synopsis | d06acf returns error for some boundary meshes due to an internal scaling issue. |
Description | d06acf returns error for some boundary meshes due to an internal scaling issue. |
Severity | Non-critical |
Issue Since Mark | 20 |
Fixed at Mark | 28.4 |
Workaround | Scale input boundary mesh prior to calling d06acf so that and . |
Synopsis | e01shf will occasionally incorrectly identify a point as being outside the region defined by the interpolant. |
Description | e01shf will occasionally incorrectly identify a point as being outside the region defined by the interpolant. This leads to the function value being extrapolated rather than interpolated and can lead to incorrect results. |
Severity | Non-critical |
Issue Since Mark | 26.0 |
Fixed at Mark | 27.1 |
Workaround | None. |
Synopsis | No check that a mandatory call to the initialization routine has been made. |
Description | Whilst it is necessary to call initialization routine e04wbf prior to calling the named e04 routines, no software check is made to ensure that this has happened. |
Severity | Non-critical |
Issue Since Mark | 20 |
Workaround | Ensure that initialization routine e04wbf has been called. |
Synopsis | and were not correctly filled by the presolver. |
Description | The arrays and were not correctly filled when the problem was entirely solved by the presolver. It now returns the correct values.
The optional parameter now correctly writes the linear constraints dual variables when no bounds are defined on the variables.
|
Severity | Non-critical |
Issue Since Mark | 26.1 |
Fixed at Mark | 27 |
Workaround | Don't rely on to hold the primal and dual objective in this case and recompute it as and , respectively. |
Synopsis | e04mtf does not report the correct solution when or more columns are proportional to each other in the constraint matrix. |
Description | e04mtf does not report the correct solution when or more columns are proportional to each other in the constraint matrix. In such a case, the solution reported may be infeasible. |
Severity | Non-critical |
Issue Since Mark | 26.1 |
Fixed at Mark | 27 |
Workaround | A workaround is to disable the more complex presolve operations by setting the optional parameter . This may slow down the solver depending on the problem. |
Synopsis | In some very rare cases, the solution reported presents big violations on a small number of linear constraints. |
Description | In some very rare cases, the solution reported presents big violations on a small number of linear constraints. |
Severity | Non-critical |
Issue Since Mark | 26.1 |
Fixed at Mark | 27.1 |
Workaround | A workaround is to deactivate the more complex presolver operations with the optional parameter . |
Synopsis | In some very rare cases, e04mtf reports problem infeasibility for a feasible problem. |
Description | In some very rare cases, the solver reports problem infeasibility when there are numerical difficulties. |
Severity | Non-critical |
Issue Since Mark | 26.1 |
Fixed at Mark | 28.6 |
Workaround | Unfortunately there is no convenient workaround. |
Synopsis | In some very rare cases, at presolve phase the solver declares unboundedness on a bounded problem. |
Description | In some very rare cases, especially when there are a large amount of singleton variables, the solver might report unbounded error message on a bounded problem. |
Severity | Non-critical |
Issue Since Mark | 26.1 |
Fixed at Mark | 29.0 |
Workaround | A workaround is to deactivate the more complex presolver operations with the optional parameter . This may slow down the solver depending on the problem. |
Synopsis | In some cases the solver declares dual infeasibility during presolving for feasible and bounded problems. |
Description | For a bounded problem, the solver reports dual infeasibility during dominated columns removal at the presolving stage. |
Severity | Non-critical |
Issue Since Mark | 26.1 |
Fixed at Mark | 29.1 |
Workaround | A workaround is to deactivate the more complex presolver operations with the optional parameter . This may slow down the solver depending on the problem. |
Synopsis | Infeasible bounds defined by e04rjf of a variable are ignored and infeasibility is not reported. |
Description | When infeasible bounds are defined by e04rjf for a variable, instead of reporting problem infeasibility, the bounds are overridden and wrong solution may be reported. |
Severity | Non-critical |
Issue Since Mark | 26.1 |
Fixed at Mark | 27.1 |
Workaround | A workaround is to deactivate the more complex presolver operations with the optional parameter for e04mtf and for e04ptf. |
Synopsis | Optional parameters and are not handled correctly. |
Description | Routines e04nrf, e04vkf and e04wef do not handle optional parameters and correctly. Specifying does not alter the behaviour of subsequent routines in the suite, and specifying erroneously reports an error. |
Severity | Non-critical |
Issue Since Mark | 8 |
Fixed at Mark | 27.3 |
Workaround | Routine e04nsf should be used instead to set optional parameters or . |
Synopsis | Information about the last constraint might not be printed. |
Description | If the problem has a nonlinear objective function without a linear part and , the last constraint is not printed in the final information about the solution (Rows section). |
Severity | Non-critical |
Issue Since Mark | 21 |
Fixed at Mark | 26 |
Workaround | None. |
Synopsis | When is returned, the expected value of in the error message may be wrongly reported. |
Description | When is returned, the expected value of in the error message may be wrongly reported. This incorrect behaviour may occur when the internal solver works with a different number of variables than what is declared during handle initialization, e.g., when some variables are fixed by the user. |
Severity | Non-critical |
Issue Since Mark | 28.3 |
Fixed at Mark | 30.2 |
Workaround | None. |
Synopsis | Multithreaded versions of the routines f11bef, f11bsf, f11gef and f11gsf may produce slightly different results when run on multiple threads. |
Description | Multithreaded versions of the routines f11bef, f11bsf, f11gef and f11gsf may produce slightly different results when run on multiple threads, e.g., the number of iterations to solution and the computed matrix norms and termination criteria reported by the associated monitoring routines. A bug affecting f11bef and f11gef has been fixed, and parallel vector dot products have been modified in all routines to improve consistency of results. |
Severity | Non-critical |
Issue Since Mark | 19 |
Fixed at Mark | 27.1 |
Workaround | None. |
Synopsis | f16rbf and f16ubf return if or is , instead of the correct norm. is incorrectly forced to be at least when . |
Description | f16rbf and f16ubf mistakenly make a quick return if or is , instead of computing the correct value for the requested norm. Also, is incorrectly forced to be at least when . |
Severity | Critical |
Issue Since Mark | 23 |
Fixed at Mark | 27.3 |
Workaround | None. |
Synopsis | If the first row or column of the weight matrix consists only of zeros, then the routine will fail to find the nearest correlation matrix for that weight matrix. |
Description | An error can occur when the first row or column of the weight matrix consists only of zeros, then the routine will fail to find the nearest correlation matrix for that weight matrix. |
Severity | Critical |
Issue Since Mark | 25 |
Fixed at Mark | 30.1 |
Workaround | The workaround is to apply a small weight (relative to other non-zero weights given in ) to one of the elements in the first row/column. |
Synopsis | A segmentation fault is likely to occur if a model with multiple random statements is supplied to the routine, where at least one of those statements does not have a term. |
Description | A segmentation fault is likely to occur if a model with multiple random statements is supplied to the routine, where at least one of those statements does not have a term.
For example, a model specified using:
V1 + V2 / SUBJECT = V3 V4 + V5 / SUBJECT = V6would not trigger the error, but one specified using: V1 + V2 V4 + V5 / SUBJECT = V6would. The error is not triggered when there is only a single random statement, so a model specified using just
V1 + V2will not trigger the error. |
Severity | Critical |
Issue Since Mark | 27 |
Fixed at Mark | 27.1 |
Workaround | A workaround to this issue is to always supply a term. If the required model is of the form:
V1 + V2 V4 + V5 / SUBJECT = V6then you can specify an equivalent model by using: V1 + V2 / SUBJECT = DUMMY V4 + V5 / SUBJECT = V6where the variable |
Synopsis | The wrong value for is returned when is large. |
Description | In g08ckf and g08clf the value returned for the upper tail probability is wrong when the calculated Anderson-Darling test statistic is large. In the case of g08ckf, when the returned value of should be zero; in the case of g08clf, when the returned value of should be . |
Severity | Critical |
Issue Since Mark | 23 |
Workaround | Workaround for g08ckf:
Call g08ckf(...) If (aa2 > 153.4677d0) p = 0.0d0Workaround for g08clf: Call g08clf(...) If (aa2 > 10.03d0) p = exp(-14.360135d0) |
Synopsis | g13faf may return a negative value as the estimate of the last parameter (i.e., ) for a subset of models. |
Description | g13faf can result in a negative value for the estimate of the last parameter (i.e., ) or, if , the last parameter (i.e., ).
This issue only affects a subset of models that have normally distributed errors and do not include an asymmetry term.
If the routine did not return a negative value as the estimate of the last parameter (or, if , the last parameter), then that particular model was not affected by the issue.
|
Severity | Critical |
Issue Since Mark | 20 |
Fixed at Mark | 27 |
Workaround | None |
Synopsis | When the information returned in and/or may be incorrect. |
Description | The information returned in and/or may be incorrect in cases where and the underlying linear mixed effects regression model has a random variable, with a single level (so either binary or continuous), that only takes the value zero. |
Severity | Non-critical |
Issue Since Mark | 27.0 |
Workaround | The work around is to drop the term from the model, as it does not contribute. For example, if the random part of your model was specified as: V1 + V2 / SUBJECT=V3 and the variable V2 was a continuous variable, that only takes a value of zero in the data, then this is equivalent to re-specifying the model using: V1 / SUBJECT=V3. |
Synopsis | In some cases, solver returns inaccurate solution when there are binary variables. |
Description | When there are binary variables, the accuracy of the solution will be influenced by the initial values. The solver could return inaccurate solution. |
Severity | Non-critical |
Issue Since Mark | 25 |
Fixed at Mark | 29.1 |
Workaround | The work around is to use integer variables with and as lower and upper bound, respectively. |
Synopsis | Thread Local Storage default limit was exceeded for delay loaded shared library. |
Description | A fair amount of thread local storage had been allocated by an auxiliary routine which has now been updated to use a very small amount of thread local storage. Prior to the update, this only affected the case where the shared version of the Nag Library was delay loaded, since this assumed a small default maximum amount of thread local storage, which was in fact exceeded.
The issue had been present since the introduction of the auxiliary routine at Mark 26.1. From Mark 28.6, the amount of thread local storage used is very small and this is no longer an issue.
|
Severity | Non-critical |
Issue Since Mark | 26.1 |
Fixed at Mark | 28.6 |
Workaround | None. |
Synopsis | On Linux, static linking of the NAG Library using a recent Intel Fortran compiler results in a link error due to multiple defines. |
Description | (This error report applies to Linux library NLL6I only).
On Linux, static linking of the NAG Library using a recent Intel Fortran compiler results in a link error due to multiple defines.
This is due to the inclusion of some Intel compiler runtime libraries into the static NAG Library. This was originally to simplify the linking of the NAG Library using ifort, where otherwise each such runtime would have had to be specified on the link line.
However, recent versions of ifort and ifx have now added these compiler runtime libraries into the list of libraries to be linked by default. Thus, using these newer versions of ifort/ifx results in the said runtimes being linked twice.
|
Severity | Critical |
Issue Since Mark | |
Fixed at Mark | |
Workaround | The recommended workaround is to link to the shared Library when this problem presents itself. |