E05SBF Example Program Results Minimization of the Schwefel function. Subject to one non-linear constraint. 1. Solution without using coupled local minimizer Algorithm Statistics -------------------- Total complete iterations : 2696 Complete iterations since improvement : 1002 Total particles converged to xb : 0 Total improvements to global optimum : 1843 Total function evaluations : 593321 Total particles re-initialized : 0 Total constraints violated : 0 Solution Status : No improvement in preset iteration lim Achieved objective value : -9191.499 Final position achieved : xb( 1) = -406.08 xb( 2) = -406.75 xb( 3) = -406.74 xb( 4) = -404.31 xb( 5) = -405.53 xb( 6) = -407.49 xb( 7) = -406.80 xb( 8) = -407.76 xb( 9) = 384.69 xb( 10) = 384.64 xb( 11) = 385.73 xb( 12) = 386.92 xb( 13) = 385.67 xb( 14) = 386.42 xb( 15) = 384.38 xb( 16) = 385.73 xb( 17) = 383.65 xb( 18) = 387.38 xb( 19) = -1.55 xb( 20) = -406.73 Final constraint violations achieved : cb( 1) = 0.00 2. Solution using coupled local minimizer E04UCF Algorithm Statistics -------------------- Total complete iterations : 1046 Complete iterations since improvement : 1002 Total particles converged to xb : 0 Total improvements to global optimum : 117 Total function evaluations : 231946 Total particles re-initialized : 0 Total constraints violated : 0 Solution Status : No improvement in preset iteration lim Achieved objective value : -9198.430 Final position achieved : xb( 1) = -406.65 xb( 2) = -406.65 xb( 3) = -406.65 xb( 4) = -406.65 xb( 5) = -406.65 xb( 6) = -406.65 xb( 7) = -406.65 xb( 8) = -406.65 xb( 9) = 385.51 xb( 10) = 385.51 xb( 11) = 385.51 xb( 12) = 385.51 xb( 13) = 385.51 xb( 14) = 385.51 xb( 15) = 385.51 xb( 16) = 385.51 xb( 17) = 385.51 xb( 18) = 385.51 xb( 19) = -2.06 xb( 20) = -406.65 Final constraint violations achieved : cb( 1) = 0.00