PDF version (NAG web site
, 64-bit version, 64-bit version)
NAG Toolbox: nag_lapack_zptrfs (f07jv)
Purpose
nag_lapack_zptrfs (f07jv) computes error bounds and refines the solution to a complex system of linear equations
, where
is an
by
Hermitian positive definite tridiagonal matrix and
and
are
by
matrices, using the modified Cholesky factorization returned by
nag_lapack_zpttrf (f07jr) and an initial solution returned by
nag_lapack_zpttrs (f07js). Iterative refinement is used to reduce the backward error as much as possible.
Syntax
[
x,
ferr,
berr,
info] = f07jv(
uplo,
d,
e,
df,
ef,
b,
x, 'n',
n, 'nrhs_p',
nrhs_p)
[
x,
ferr,
berr,
info] = nag_lapack_zptrfs(
uplo,
d,
e,
df,
ef,
b,
x, 'n',
n, 'nrhs_p',
nrhs_p)
Description
nag_lapack_zptrfs (f07jv) should normally be preceded by calls to
nag_lapack_zpttrf (f07jr) and
nag_lapack_zpttrs (f07js).
nag_lapack_zpttrf (f07jr) computes a modified Cholesky factorization of the matrix
as
where
is a unit lower bidiagonal matrix and
is a diagonal matrix, with positive diagonal elements.
nag_lapack_zpttrs (f07js) then utilizes the factorization to compute a solution,
, to the required equations. Letting
denote a column of
,
nag_lapack_zptrfs (f07jv) computes a
component-wise backward error,
, the smallest relative perturbation in each element of
and
such that
is the exact solution of a perturbed system
The function also estimates a bound for the component-wise forward error in the computed solution defined by , where is the corresponding column of the exact solution, .
Note that the modified Cholesky factorization of
can also be expressed as
where
is unit upper bidiagonal.
References
Anderson E, Bai Z, Bischof C, Blackford S, Demmel J, Dongarra J J, Du Croz J J, Greenbaum A, Hammarling S, McKenney A and Sorensen D (1999)
LAPACK Users' Guide (3rd Edition) SIAM, Philadelphia
http://www.netlib.org/lapack/lug
Parameters
Compulsory Input Parameters
- 1:
– string (length ≥ 1)
-
Specifies the form of the factorization as follows:
- .
- .
Constraint:
or .
- 2:
– double array
-
The dimension of the array
d
must be at least
Must contain the diagonal elements of the matrix of .
- 3:
– complex array
-
The dimension of the array
e
must be at least
If
,
e must contain the
superdiagonal elements of the matrix
.
If
,
e must contain the
subdiagonal elements of the matrix
.
- 4:
– double array
-
The dimension of the array
df
must be at least
Must contain the diagonal elements of the diagonal matrix from the factorization of .
- 5:
– complex array
-
The dimension of the array
ef
must be at least
If
,
ef must contain the
superdiagonal elements of the unit upper bidiagonal matrix
from the
factorization of
.
If
,
ef must contain the
subdiagonal elements of the unit lower bidiagonal matrix
from the
factorization of
.
- 6:
– complex array
-
The first dimension of the array
b must be at least
.
The second dimension of the array
b must be at least
.
The by matrix of right-hand sides .
- 7:
– complex array
-
The first dimension of the array
x must be at least
.
The second dimension of the array
x must be at least
.
The by initial solution matrix .
Optional Input Parameters
- 1:
– int64int32nag_int scalar
-
Default:
the first dimension of the arrays
b,
x and the dimension of the arrays
d,
df.
, the order of the matrix .
Constraint:
.
- 2:
– int64int32nag_int scalar
-
Default:
the second dimension of the arrays
b,
x.
, the number of right-hand sides, i.e., the number of columns of the matrix .
Constraint:
.
Output Parameters
- 1:
– complex array
-
The first dimension of the array
x will be
.
The second dimension of the array
x will be
.
The by refined solution matrix .
- 2:
– double array
-
Estimate of the forward error bound for each computed solution vector, such that
, where
is the
th column of the computed solution returned in the array
x and
is the corresponding column of the exact solution
. The estimate is almost always a slight overestimate of the true error.
- 3:
– double array
-
Estimate of the component-wise relative backward error of each computed solution vector (i.e., the smallest relative change in any element of or that makes an exact solution).
- 4:
– int64int32nag_int scalar
unless the function detects an error (see
Error Indicators and Warnings).
Error Indicators and Warnings
-
If , argument had an illegal value. An explanatory message is output, and execution of the program is terminated.
Accuracy
The computed solution for a single right-hand side,
, satisfies an equation of the form
where
and
is the
machine precision. An approximate error bound for the computed solution is given by
where
, the condition number of
with respect to the solution of the linear equations. See Section 4.4 of
Anderson et al. (1999) for further details.
Function
nag_lapack_zptcon (f07ju) can be used to compute the condition number of
.
Further Comments
The total number of floating-point operations required to solve the equations is proportional to . At most five steps of iterative refinement are performed, but usually only one or two steps are required.
The real analogue of this function is
nag_lapack_dptrfs (f07jh).
Example
This example solves the equations
where
is the Hermitian positive definite tridiagonal matrix
and
Estimates for the backward errors and forward errors are also output.
Open in the MATLAB editor:
f07jv_example
function f07jv_example
fprintf('f07jv example results\n\n');
d = [ 16 41 46 21];
e = [ 16 + 16i 18 - 9i 1 - 4i ];
[df, ef, info] = f07jr( ...
d, e);
b = [ 64 + 16i, -16 - 32i;
93 + 62i, 61 - 66i;
78 - 80i, 71 - 74i;
14 - 27i, 35 + 15i];
uplo = 'L';
[x, info] = f07js( ...
uplo, df, ef, b);
[x, ferr, berr, info] = f07jv( ...
uplo, d, e, df, ef, b, x);
disp('Solution(s)');
disp(x);
fprintf('Forward error bounds = %10.1e %10.1e\n',ferr);
fprintf('Backward error bounds = %10.1e %10.1e\n',berr);
f07jv example results
Solution(s)
2.0000 + 1.0000i -3.0000 - 2.0000i
1.0000 + 1.0000i 1.0000 + 1.0000i
1.0000 - 2.0000i 1.0000 - 2.0000i
1.0000 - 1.0000i 2.0000 + 1.0000i
Forward error bounds = 9.0e-12 6.1e-12
Backward error bounds = 0.0e+00 0.0e+00
PDF version (NAG web site
, 64-bit version, 64-bit version)
© The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd, Oxford, UK. 2009–2015