NAG Library Routine Document
E01ZMF
1 Purpose
E01ZMF generates a multi-dimensional interpolant to a set of scattered data points, using a modified Shepard method. When the number of dimensions is no more than five, there are corresponding routines in
Chapter E01 which are specific to the given dimensionality.
E01SGF generates the two-dimensional interpolant, while
E01TGF,
E01TKF and
E01TMF generate the three-, four- and five-dimensional interpolants respectively.
2 Specification
INTEGER |
D, M, NW, NQ, IQ(2*M+1), IFAIL |
REAL (KIND=nag_wp) |
X(D,M), F(M), RQ(*) |
|
3 Description
E01ZMF constructs a smooth function , which interpolates a set of scattered data points , for , using a modification of Shepard's method. The surface is continuous and has continuous first partial derivatives.
The basic Shepard method, which is a generalization of the two-dimensional method described in
Shepard (1968), interpolates the input data with the weighted mean
where
,
.
The basic method is global in that the interpolated value at any point depends on all the data, but E01ZMF uses a modification (see
Franke and Nielson (1980) and
Renka (1988a)), whereby the method becomes local by adjusting each
to be zero outside a hypersphere with centre
and some radius
. Also, to improve the performance of the basic method, each
above is replaced by a function
, which is a quadratic fitted by weighted least squares to data local to
and forced to interpolate
. In this context, a point
is defined to be local to another point if it lies within some distance
of it.
The efficiency of E01ZMF is enhanced by using a cell method for nearest neighbour searching due to
Bentley and Friedman (1979) with a cell density of
.
The radii
and
are chosen to be just large enough to include
and
data points, respectively, for user-supplied constants
and
. Default values of these parameters are provided, and advice on alternatives is given in
Section 8.2.
E01ZMF is derived from the new implementation of QSHEP3 described by
Renka (1988b). It uses the modification for high-dimensional interpolation described by
Berry and Minser (1999).
Values of the interpolant
generated by E01ZMF, and its first partial derivatives, can subsequently be evaluated for points in the domain of the data by a call to
E01ZNF.
4 References
Bentley J L and Friedman J H (1979) Data structures for range searching ACM Comput. Surv. 11 397–409
Berry M W, Minser K S (1999) Algorithm 798: high-dimensional interpolation using the modified Shepard method ACM Trans. Math. Software 25 353–366
Franke R and Nielson G (1980) Smooth interpolation of large sets of scattered data Internat. J. Num. Methods Engrg. 15 1691–1704
Renka R J (1988a) Multivariate interpolation of large sets of scattered data ACM Trans. Math. Software 14 139–148
Renka R J (1988b) Algorithm 661: QSHEP3D: Quadratic Shepard method for trivariate interpolation of scattered data ACM Trans. Math. Software 14 151–152
Shepard D (1968) A two-dimensional interpolation function for irregularly spaced data Proc. 23rd Nat. Conf. ACM 517–523 Brandon/Systems Press Inc., Princeton
5 Parameters
- 1: D – INTEGERInput
On entry: , the number of dimensions.
Constraint:
.
- 2: M – INTEGERInput
On entry:
, the number of data points.
Note: on the basis of experimental results reported in
Berry and Minser (1999), when
it is recommended to use
.
Constraint:
.
- 3: X(D,M) – REAL (KIND=nag_wp) arrayInput
On entry: must be set to the Cartesian coordinates of the data point , for .
Constraint:
these coordinates must be distinct, and must not all lie on the same -dimensional hypersurface.
- 4: F(M) – REAL (KIND=nag_wp) arrayInput
On entry: must be set to the data value , for .
- 5: NW – INTEGERInput
On entry: the number
of data points that determines each radius of influence
, appearing in the definition of each of the weights
, for
(see
Section 3). Note that
is different for each weight. If
the default value
is used instead.
Suggested value:
Constraint:
.
- 6: NQ – INTEGERInput
On entry: the number
of data points to be used in the least squares fit for coefficients defining the quadratic functions
(see
Section 3). If
the default value
is used instead.
Suggested value:
Constraint:
or .
- 7: IQ() – INTEGER arrayOutput
On exit: integer data defining the interpolant .
- 8: RQ() – REAL (KIND=nag_wp) arrayOutput
-
Note: the dimension of the array
RQ
must be at least
.
On exit: real data defining the interpolant .
- 9: IFAIL – INTEGERInput/Output
-
On entry:
IFAIL must be set to
,
. If you are unfamiliar with this parameter you should refer to
Section 3.3 in the Essential Introduction for details.
For environments where it might be inappropriate to halt program execution when an error is detected, the value
is recommended. If the output of error messages is undesirable, then the value
is recommended. Otherwise, if you are not familiar with this parameter, the recommended value is
.
When the value is used it is essential to test the value of IFAIL on exit.
On exit:
unless the routine detects an error or a warning has been flagged (see
Section 6).
6 Error Indicators and Warnings
-
On entry, exceeds the largest machine integer.
and .
On entry, .
Constraint: .
On entry, and .
Constraint: .
On entry, and .
Constraint: or .
On entry, and .
Constraint: .
On entry, and .
Constraint: .
-
There are duplicate nodes in the dataset. , for , and . The interpolant cannot be derived.
-
On entry, all the data points lie on the same hypersurface. No unique solution exists.
-
Dynamic memory allocation failed.
7 Accuracy
In experiments undertaken by
Berry and Minser (1999), the accuracies obtained for a conditional function resulting in sharp functional transitions were of the order of
at best. In other cases in these experiments, the function generated interpolates the input data with maximum absolute error of the order of
.
The time taken for a call to E01ZMF will depend in general on the distribution of the data points and on the choice of and parameters. If the data points are uniformly randomly distributed, then the time taken should be . At worst time will be required.
Default values of the parameters and may be selected by calling E01ZMF with and . These default values may well be satisfactory for many applications.
If nondefault values are required they must be supplied to E01ZMF through positive values of
NW and
NQ. Increasing these parameter values makes the method less local. This may increase the accuracy of the resulting interpolant at the expense of increased computational cost. The default values
and
have been chosen on the basis of experimental results reported in
Renka (1988a) and
Berry and Minser (1999). For further advice on the choice of these parameters see
Renka (1988a) and
Berry and Minser (1999).
9 Example
This program reads in a set of
data points and calls E01ZMF to construct an interpolating function
. It then calls
E01ZNF to evaluate the interpolant at a set of points.
Note that this example is not typical of a realistic problem: the number of data points would normally be very much larger.
See also
Section 9 in E01ZNF.
9.1 Program Text
Program Text (e01zmfe.f90)
9.2 Program Data
Program Data (e01zmfe.d)
9.3 Program Results
Program Results (e01zmfe.r)